Massartu — the Intelligence sector deployment of Baru and Nabu, operated as separate systems. In development. It is being built as the watch and the record, with a deliberate gap between them — nothing crosses except through a person with the authority to carry it.
It assembles the intelligence. It never renders the judgment.
no person-level behavioural prediction and no biometric identification — categorically, in any configuration.
Intelligence work runs on two motions: the standing watch over what is happening now, and the interrogation of what is already lawfully held. Most platforms promise to merge them. Massartu is built on the opposite conviction — that collection and holdings answer to different authorities, and a system that bridges them automatically has made a legal decision no machine should make. Massartu provides a platform for each motion, and refuses to be the bridge.
All-source fusion of what is happening now: many streams reconciled into one current, evidence-backed picture. It fuses and tags — labels, correlates, attaches provenance. It derives no conclusions, renders no assessments, and authorises no action beyond bounded sensor direction under an earned mandate.
The interrogation of holdings at a scale no analyst team can read: every finding cited to sealed source material, reproducible, carried in a tamper-evident chain of custody.
No automated path exists between them — no query, no cueing, no data flow, in either direction, in any configuration. When the picture raises a question the archive should answer, an analyst carries it across under a recorded mandate, through the organisation’s own authorisation process. The crossing is a human act, and it leaves a record on both sides.
The watch fuses and tags; the record retrieves and cites; neither concludes, and nothing moves between them without a named analyst’s mandated decision. Massartu performs no person-level behavioural prediction and makes no biometric identification — categorically, in any configuration. Analytic judgment belongs to a cleared human, every time.
This line holds in every Enkidu sector — see Trust.
Massartu is not a third programme and not a fusion of two. It is a Baru instance and a Nabu instance deployed side by side for the intelligence mission, separately accreditable and independently disconnectable, under the sector’s own governance and oversight. What each platform guarantees everywhere, each instance guarantees here — and the gap between them is guaranteed by architecture: every crossing is deliberate, attributable, and verifiable after the fact.
Both instances run on the same shared stack — one layer for where things may happen, one for whether they may. Anshar bounds each instance to its own zone with explicit entry and exit conditions, which is what makes the gap structural rather than procedural; Kittu governs what each agent may do and records the evidence behind every element an analyst sees. The full detail lives on the platform page.
Massartu is in development. A briefing covers the two-instance architecture, the gap between them, and what accreditation would involve in your environment.
On its Nabu side, Massartu is being built to be staffed and tooled through Enkidu’s services: personas from Ummânu — the Enterprise AI Workforce Instrument — and promoted skills from Kulla — the Governed Skill Production Instrument — each stamped into the custody record. No availability, customer or performance claim is made for Massartu.