Platform/Ekur/Kittu
Ekur · one of four capabilities

Kittu

trust assurance

Kittu earns trust claim by claim, step by step.

What it is

Kittu is the trust assurance capability of Ekur. Every trust claim is bound to a policy with an explicit threshold, reduced to a measurable outcome and carried by a signed, hash-linked chain of evidence. Evidence expires and must be re-earned. The same structure runs live: a zero-trust reference monitor sits at every boundary, so nothing an agent produces is trusted by default.

Left: the assurance case — policy binds a claim, the claim is argued to evidence, and is satisfied only when the outcome meets the threshold and the evidence chain validates. Right: the reference monitor at ingress, handoff, tool-call and egress checkpoints, and the graduated trust-zone ladder from ingress to privileged, with quarantine.
The assurance case and the reference monitor. Source: Enkidu (S4).Scroll the figure horizontally →
How it works
A
Claim, argument, evidence.

A claim is satisfied only when two conditions both hold: the measured outcome meets the policy’s threshold, and the supporting evidence chain validates — every signature verifies, no link is broken, nothing has expired.

B
Provenance.

Everything that supports a claim — datasets, model artifacts, evaluation runs, telemetry, security findings, human sign-offs — carries its own signed, hash-linked record of what was produced, how, and who is accountable. Evidence expires, so the system is forced to re-measure as the world changes.

C
The reference monitor.

At inference time a checkpoint sits at every boundary — where a request enters, where one agent hands off to another, where a tool is called, where output leaves — and brokers every crossing against policy. Upstream output is untrusted input to the next step; delegated authority never exceeds the authority that delegated it; security checks fail closed.

D
Graduated trust zones.

An agent starts with no standing capability and earns more through demonstrated behaviour. Promotion is slow; demotion is instant. Actuators and irreversible actions require a person’s approval per action.

E
Separation of duties.

The component that assesses an agent, the one that rules on its zone and the one that grants capability are never the same, so no agent — and no single compromised service — can promote itself.

What it assures

Nine trust components, each mapped to the NIST AI Risk Management Framework:

Competence & reliability Transparency & explainability Calibrated confidence Predictability & consistency Accountability & recourse Fairness & bias management Security & robustness Alignment with intent Human agency & reliance
How it fits with the other three

Anshar defines the boundary; Kittu verifies every crossing of it.

Nusku distributes; Kittu admits — nothing installs or runs on a node that Kittu has not verified against policy and lineage.

Shedu answers who is acting and whether anything is intact, as signed evidence; Kittu decides whether to proceed. Shedu never renders a verdict; Kittu never holds a key.

Standards

Aligned to the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST SP 800-207 zero-trust architecture and the W3C PROV data model, so that a trust dossier is defensible to an external auditor, regulator or customer. Alignment is not certification.

Kittu is documented for client distribution and has been exercised end to end, together with Anshar, in a delivered engagement. No availability, customer or performance claims.

9

trust components assured, each mapped to the NIST AI RMF trustworthiness characteristics. Source: Enkidu (S4).

Further reading
Kittu — Trust Assurance Overview S4 · v1.0Available on request
Related